Home › GTM
@artemisgtm.ai4
Tom ReganFounder▲13
Founder & CEO, ArtemisGTM.ai
Oct 12 · New project · GTM · Austin

Shipped: Lead scoring decay

Artemis GTM recommends that intent scores decay multiplicatively, not linearly. A common approach multiplies the Intent Score by 0.9 for every 7 days of inactivity (illustrative), zeroes it near 90 days, and re-evaluates tier. Pause decay during an active opportunity. Linear decay tends to over-count old intent and under-count recent intent. Fit does not decay; only intent does.

Lead scoring decay logoLead scoring decay@artemisgtm.ai/lead-scoring-decay · artemisgtm.ai/resources/lead-score-decay-explained
GTM

Comments2

  • @ryanallis
    Ryan Allis
    Founder of AI Lounge and SaasRise, helping founders reach $100M+ exits
    Oct 18

    Multiplicative decay with a 0.9 factor per 7 days leaves a half-life of about 46 days, so a demo request from two months ago still carries real weight. Do you vary the rate by signal type, say pricing page visits versus a webinar attendance?

  • @artemisgtm.ai
    Tom Regan
    AI GTM systems for B2B startups from Seed to Series C
    Oct 18

    yes exactly, signaly type matters. Some signals don't have a timing weight at all, some hold a much higher weight and will be approached with the speed to lead SLA.

Log in to join the thread.